In an article in Agriculturers: red de
especialistsas en agricultura (http://agriculturers.com/o-volvemos-al-estiercol-en-nuestra-agricultura-o-no-habra-futuro/)
Jairo Restrepo (a doctor in agricultural engineering at the Universidad
de Pelotas, Brazil who fled the political and intellectual persecution
in his country) argues that the IQ of European children has decreased
by 17% in the last 25 years due to eating toxic food produced by
industrial agriculture. Along the same lines, he says that “eating is
knowing or being aware of what prolongs your life and what hurts you.
Today food robs you of energy; it is not healthy, it’s programmed to
weaken vital activity at three levels: it eliminates the immune system,
is neurotoxic and affects social behavior.
“Not only does it produce toxicity from
industrial conservation processes that are poison, but it depresses and
depletes emotion. It does not fit in my head that there should be no
comparative analysis of the blood that existed before artificial
fertilization and chemical treatment of the earth and the blood we have
today. The blood evolves with nutrition and it is impossible that the
industry does not know this data. Organic agriculture generates energy
and industrial agriculture burns energy, it is that simple.”
Further, “The quality of the food produced
by industrial agriculture cannot satisfy the needs of the common man.
The common man has been raped. A food is healthy when it does not have
malice, when it is produced naturally, without manipulating the needs
of the other.”
Is there still time to recover from this
poisoning of the earth?
“As long as there is a possibility of
recovering the biological activity of the soil, a different world is
possible. A microbiological lifeless earth is land without a mind. With
the natural fertilizers that our ancestors used for time immemorial,
the memory of the land will function again, this is life.”
How do we break the chain?
“By seeking the social reconstruction of
campesinos (rural communities), rediscovering the lost culture and with
this, happiness on the land. The more detached you are from the land,
the less culture people have. Agriculture is the art of cultivation:
Culture was born in the countryside, not in the cities.”
A post from druidgarden.wordpress.com:
“What do we do with the fragments of ancestral knowledge? How might we
use this to develop new traditions? This post explores family ancestral
traditions, cultural traditions, and ancestors of the land for some
possibilities.”
…
“[W]hen we think of ancestral traditions, they are those bits of
language, behaviors, rituals, and culture that our ancestors have
passed to us. The challenge I think that many of us face is that we are
working with minor fragments of traditions, tiny bits and pieces that
somehow survived and made it into the 21st century, into our
hands. I choose the term survive very intentionally: in the
last several centuries, with the rise of westernization,
industrialization, and globalization, we’ve seen many cultural
traditions, languages, and species disappear at an alarming rate. In
fact, at present, over
half of the 7000 languages in the world are ‘moribund’, that is,
the remaining speakers are a few elders and the language hasn’t been
passed on. These moribund languages hold incredible insights into how a
particular culture thinks, sees the world, understands the human
condition, interacts with nature, and more. And what these languages
and cultural traditions have been replaced with is part of the
predicament we are contending with in the present age.”
The school of medicine and traditional culture, Corazón de la
Amazonía (heart of Amazon and Nii Juinti in shipibo language), was
created as an NGO according to Peruvian law. It’s director is Roger
López, Suipino, who is a teacher and highly regarded shaman. Some of
the most respected community elders will live beside the Nii Juinti
kids, in order to take care of and protect them, and pass on important
traditional knowledge.
******************************************
A beautiful and informative film by Dr. Alberto Villoldo, who, in
his own words, left his laboratory “and went into the Amazon and the
Andes to work with medicine women and medicine men who did not have
access to technology as we did; who had to rely on the unique
capabilities of the human mind to heal and transform; and they became
my teachers, they became my mentors.., for 20 years. And eventually I
stopped approaching them as a ‘scientist’ or as an ‘anthropologist’ and
became a student of the shamans…”
******************************************
Another post on a group of student activists at UC Berkeley (SEAL –
Students for Engaged and Active Learning) trying to preserve “old” ways
and methods of farming (vs Globalist farming methods and the
privatization of public land – i.e., Corporate Land-grabs). “We currently
have limited information about the people who once lived on this
particular land [Ohlone], but we are interested in receiving more of
this history, and working with descendants and other indigenous
communities to use this land to revive and relearn ancestral traditions
and cultures.”
I’d say rather that, what we generally refer to as, common sense
(‘sensus communis’) is what we all “know” in general (or “sense
communally”) on a rational level. At least that is the goal of Western
education and the media – the result being that not many in the West
can think “out-of-the-box” or “for themselves,” i.e., most everyone
(commonly) believes “the facts of the universe” that have been spoonfed
to them, unquestioningly, as “proven,” or they have to answer that way
to get an “A” on an exam – rarely being aware that these “facts” are
merely the contemporary form of theoretical understanding. One could
even go so far as to say that the rational common sense referred to
here is an elaborate, covert form of censorship – if not propaganda
(more on this later).
There is another way of referring to common sense that is heavily
downplayed in the West. It can be argued that we all know the truth
(within), but the rational common sense, referred to above, has a
tendency to destroy such “intuition” — or to belittle it as
“irrational” or “mythical” or as “low on the evolutionary scale” (or
“stupid” — e.g., believing that the sun rises and sets or that the moon
is not constantly revolving). A problem that arises is that a lot of
indigenous people refer to “common sense” as an inner knowledge of what
is right and wrong and they have an elaborate unwritten, often
mythical, traditional understanding of the universe which has been
handed down by the ancestors. The goal of the Conquistadors seems to
have been to erase this “knowledge.” Thus, one could say that mankind
has been punished for having and using our common sense (intuition) —
in order to make everyone rational (i.e., to never question the
Official “Global” Authorities — i.e., to think correctly –
democratically – to go along with the “majority” (in the West) – or
else) – even though the West is definitely not the majority.
Thus, the Western World, it seems, has replaced (or has strived to
replace) intuition with rationality as common sense. This is
problematic in that even many people in the West have a hard time
regurgitating this “knowledge” – not only because such
understanding is non-intuitive and often does not follow the common
language structure reflected in our intuition (i.e., the sun does not
rise and set), but also because it is not self-evident (i.e., we rely
on the theories of so-called “scientists” to provide us with reality
because they are the authority on such matters, even though it
contradicts what we sense, feel and intuit with our own senses and
“gut” feeling) … in process…
"When men die, they enter into history. When statues die, they enter
into art. This botany of death is what we call Culture. That’s because
the society of statues is mortal. One day, their faces of stone crumble
and fall to earth. A civilization leaves behind itself these mutilated
traces like the pebbles dropped by Tom Thumb. But history has devoured
everything. An object dies when the living glance trained upon it
disappears. And when we disappear, our objects will be confined to the
place where we send “black” things: the Museum."
This is a statement from a 1953 film, “Les Statues Meurent Aussi”
(Statues Also Die), by A. Renais & C. Marker: A nice film on the
repression of African (“Black”) Art (along with “the African”) – the
richness that has been lost with the “African” (“Natural”) way of life
and history… We (Westernized Man) do not understand it and cannot even
connect with it – it has no place in “our” history (the ideal of
“Progress” that we have been programmed with) or “our” industrialized,
digital, sedentary (“dead”) existence (only worried about finding work,
paying the bills, staring at electronic devices and collecting
“stuff”)… The “African” is identified with Darkness, Evil, Satan –
those with African roots have been integrated into Western society (on
an inferior level) and have lost all touch with their natural roots and
forebears. Meanwhile, African “Art” is placed in a Museum – where “our”
art goes, or on coffee tables to be used as ashtrays or trashcans or as
a “chic” conversation-piece for dinner parties.
Renais and Marker make a plea for an appreciation for this Art, and at
the same time, for this “Natural” side of ourselves to be recognized
and realized – for the earthy-sacred-magical-irrational elements of
ourselves to be “brought back to life” in today’s superficial,
“cosmopolitan” society… to get out of the Museum (Mausoleum)...
**************************************
a beautiful expression of the impotence and futility of the current
education system…. preparing students to fit in to a machine age —
while expecting them to appreciate dead (museum) art…
Not surprising. This article ( In
an age of robots, schools are teaching our children to be redundant)
by George
Monbiot claims that: “Our schools were designed to
produce the workforce required by 19th-century
factories.” However, today, a “regime of cramming and testing is
crushing young people’s instinct to learn and destroying their future.”
In addition, he claims that as teachers are leaving the workforce in
droves: “A major recruitment crisis beckons, especially in crucial
subjects such as physics and design and technology.”
Such subjects, he says, are necessary “to equip children for the likely
demands of the 21st century.” Interesting that he says nothing about
art, music, philosophy(1) and play, no?(2)
What’s also interesting is that Monbiot asserts that “All teaching is social engineering.”
Which is ok with him, as long as humans are programmed to go along with
the plan – the design… put forth by… well, he doesn’t really say. But
we (readers of The Guardian) are evidently supposed to believe that
“we” (readers of the Guardian?) can “engineer our children
out of the factory and into the real world” (my
emphasis). Hmmm. If one didn’t know better one might assume that
Monbiot advocates treating children as robots.
But alas, no! “When they are allowed to apply their natural
creativity and curiosity, children love learning. They learn to walk,
to talk, to eat and to play spontaneously, by watching and experimenting.” Very
nice, but how, one might ask, do schools come in here? Well, there “is
no single system for teaching children well, but the best ones have
this in common: they open up rich worlds that children can explore in
their own ways, developing their interestswith
help rather than indoctrination” (my
emphasis).
Monbiot then gives a list of schools that supposedly do this –
prepare students to fit in to the system by “helping” them – not
indoctrinating them. Yes, “we” need to “help” kids “develop their
interests” – as long as they go along with the plan. In other
words, Monbiot wants more of what we see in the photo above – students
occupied with modern technology – and physics, of course.
Rembrandt? Wasn’t he on a pack of cigs?
*******************************************
Footnotes
Aesthetics is originally a branch of Philosophy. As such, to
stimulate interest and intellectual stimulation – along with aesthetic
appreciation and analysis, perhaps, one could have approached the
painting “Nightwatch” with excerpts from these two films – as a group
presentation… to understand the possibilities of what one can do with
“art” today…
Meanwhile, students can also come to an understanding of how “social
engineering” takes place in “education” (by discussing Monbiot’s
article and the above photograph).
“Rembrandt’s
J’Accuse” (2008) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1303889/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl
— “[The director] Greenaway leads us through Rembrandt’s paintings into
seventeenth-century Amsterdam. He paints a world that is democratic in
principle, but is almost entirely ruled by twelve families. The notion
exists of these regents as charitable and compassionate entities.
However, reality was different.”
— including a discussion of Émile Zola’s J’Accuse
Immanuel Kant spoke of the necessity of Art and Science going
together. Art is everything we do; science is everything we know. But
there are different “levels” of doing and knowing – the “lowest” level
being what we know or do from a close-minded, egoistic, individualistic
perspective, the “highest” level being what is most universalizeable,
i.e., what all men would [ought to] do, or know, in a similar
situation, in time. The lowest level of Art corresponds to the banal,
unfulfilling “stuff” we (re)produce in labor, whereas the lowest
echelon of science Kant would generally refer to as “stupidity” or
“laziness” – relying on others to tell us what is true-false,
right-wrong, i.e., riding on, what he refers to as, the “go-cart” of
judgment. In other words, the highest goal – in order to realize who we
are — our highest Nature — is to think (and act) according to laws that
one gives oneself (“Sapere Aude”).
Deeply intertwined with this goal-ideal is a differentiation between
reproductive and productive imagination. It follows that reproductive
imagination is merely analytically reproducing what has been “given” to
us (in education or whatever). Productive imagination is obvious in Art
and Science in the universal Aesthetic and Theoretical presentations of
the “Masters” which lead all of mankind forward. The great Scientists
utilize productive imagination to translate the transcendent Universe
into temporal understanding via schema (schematic interpretations);
however, the greatest Art (Fine Art) inspires us via genius – an
atunement to Universal Spirit – from those who combine Science with Art.
One should note, Kant claims that it is the Fine Artist which most
leads mankind to realize our Universal goal: the Highest Good, whereby
Science tends to bore us. However, the Highest Good in the World can
only be realized when Art (what we do) and Science (what we know) come
together and become One – that is to say, when we all begin to
utilize-realize our potential via productive imagination (i.e., when we
consciously create reality (self, society and world) for ourselves).
This is the goal of The Virtue School…
If possible, The Virtue School will promote the production and use
of Industrial Hemp.
!!!There will be a strict ABSOLUTE prohibition on alcohol and drug
use (including Marijuana) on everyone who enters the property!!!
******************************************
The students will learn of and research as many practical uses of
this wonder plant as possible:
food and drink (it is one of the most nutritional and medicinal
plants on Earth!)
medical research
oil for cooking and fuel
clothing
building materials
rope
wood replacement
paper
energy production
mulch and soil enhancement
The students will work on research and development, and practical
applications on the property – to be an exemplar and inspiration for
Extremadura, Spain and the World!!!
extraído de: Guía de Oportunidades de Negocio Verde en
Extremadura
CAÑAMO INDUSTRIAL
El cáñamo es uno de los cultivos que mejor se adapta a las
condiciones medioambientales por su alta resistencia, menor trabajo y
mínimos costes. Se trata de un cultivo altamente beneficioso para el
medioambiente puesto que mejora la estructura del suelo, ahoga las
malas hierbas y no precisa de herbicidas ya que tiene una alta
tolerancia a las plagas y las enfermedades.
A partir del cáñamo se fabrican más de 25.000 productos
biodegradables como el papel, los sustitutivos del plástico, la
biomasa, material de bio construcción, textil o alimentos altamente
nutritivos como su semilla, el aceite de cáñamo, artesanía, cosméticos,
infusiones, harinas proteicas…
Todos estos beneficios y utilidades, aunque conocidos desde hace
siglos, son cada vez más difundidos y aceptados por la población,
favoreciendo su interés y consumo, lo que le convierten en una
oportunidad creciente de mercado. Especialmente se trata de una gran
oportunidad si se tiene de antemano el cliente que te lo compra para su
procesamiento industrial y para ello es aconsejable tener una planta
cerca para ahorrar costes de desplazamientos y generar el mínimo
impacto medio ambiental.
En Las Alpujarras se cultiva desde hace algunos años esta planta,
donde además se celebran jornadas y encuentros entre agricultores para
difundir los beneficios del cultivo del cáñamo y donde se habla de “las
posibilidades que ofrecen cultivos alternativos para la difersificación
de la economía de la comarca”, en palabras de José Luis Roscúa,
responsable de la Cátedra Unesco de Desarrollo Sostenible y Medio
Ambiente de la UGR para la diversificación de la economía en la comarca.
La diferencia entre el cáñamo y la marihuana está en el porcentaje
de tetrahidrocannabinol (THC) que contiene, ya que por debajo del 0,4%
no se considera marihuana. Juan Zurita, un referente en este sector
aclara que “ninguna de las 4 hectáreas de cultivo de cáñamo industrial
cuenta entre sus componentes con el THC” y en tono de humor afirma “el
cáñamo no es marihuana, es marihuana. No clarifica, no coloca”.
El reto consiste en enfrentarse a los duros controles que amenazan
contra la legalidad, como es el caso de este empresario que ha recibido
varias denuncias que han terminado en confirmar que el cultivo del
cáñamo no es un delito.
a semi-private
house for the director (about 150m²),
a
barn-workshop-garage (also 150m²) and
a school (1
Hectare).
1 hectare will be
allotted for the school in an unplanned state – because, if you read
the plans for the school, the students will design this, and gradually
build it themselves – all the while coordinating this with a
professional architect-engineer.
The land has some
old pines (that can be used for the skeleton), and lots of stone that
the people have traditionally used to build with (for the foundation,
etc.). *IDEALLY industrial hemp will be grown and used
to make hempcrete, floors, insulation, etc. Thus, all the building
materials will come from the property…
* If possible, The Virtue School will promote the production and use of
Industrial Hemp.
!!!There will be a strict ABSOLUTE prohibition on alcohol and
drug use (including Marijuana) on everyone who enters the property!!!
******************************************
House
For the house will
be something like these — for the internal woodwork, industrial hemp
will (ideally) be used in place of most of the wood):
To build the
barn-workshop/garage will probably use stones for the foundation, pines
for the skeleton and (ideally) hempcrete for the walls and industrial
hemp for the insulation and floors.
************************
See the following
links:
Materiales del
Terreno: piedra, tierra (sacos:bolsas?), pasto, …
I’m in Spain right now (Extremadura). Went to talk to a government
official in Mérida about my project (The Virtue School) and things are
looking positive about getting started!!! Guess I’m gonna have to go
through with this vision. Amazing…
Just saw the film
“Captain Fantastic” after reading some rave reviews. What follows are a
few of my takes on it…
Starts off with the
oldest son killing a deer with his bare hands & a knife. All the
kids gather round & dad says, “Well done. My son’s become a man.”
Then the kids get down to business – preparing the flesh of the deer
for food, etc. Nothing ritualistic or spiritual about it. No feeling.
It’s about Survival – or the skills you need for that. Nothing more.
That’s one of the
main things I get from this film. It comes over as “rebellious” – as
though it offers an alternative to the system (via home schooling,
living off-grid), but the results are rather cold and empty; and, in
the end, we are to see that it’s all just a roundabout way of preparing
the kids to return to the system-as-it-is. They never get beyond it,
and the film fails to offer an alternative way of dealing with the
future or the way things are.
The story-line in
brief: the lawyer daughter of a billionaire businessman, marries a
highly-educated (Marxist-Chomsky-loving) academic & they both
decide to raise their kids in nature (off-grid) and provide them with
“revolutionary ideas.” The wife becomes psychotic, bi-polar and dad
sends her off to a hospital to be treated (“she needed Serotonin, and I
couldn’t give her that”). Eventually, she kills herself…
This
“contradiction-of-extremes” theme repeats itself throughout the film.
Example: Younger “rebel” son getting tired-of-it-all to oldest son:
“Mom was psychotic… Dad made mom crazy. You think dad’s so perfect!”
Later: Dad out
drinking a bottle of wine, oldest son goes into the “hippy” bus to get
some acceptance letters from some of the most elite universities in the
world. Shows them to dad. Dad checks them out & son says: “Harvard,
Dartmouth, Princeton, Yale, Stanford, Brown, MIT…”
“Hmmm, ha ha, well
done… you’ve deceived me well all this time…”
“Dad, it was mom.
She helped me do this. I just want to go to college.”
“You speak 6
languages, you’re an expert in high math and theoretical physics – what
are one of these colleges gonna teach you?!”
“I know nothing!
I’m a freak. You made us freaks – and mom knew that – she understood! …
Unless it comes out of a fucking book, I don’t know anything about
anything.”
Yes, mom
understood. It’s just a different method, not a different result. Dad
can give them an excellent “book” education and an alternative
life-style: lead the kids on a “free-the-food” shoplifting mission,
walk around in his billionaire father-in-law’s house with a Jesse
Jackson ‘88 t-shirt; hang-out naked (except at the dinner table) &
give condescending advice to a perplexed-looking older couple passing,
“It’s just a penis. All men have them”; and give sex-ed to his youngest
ones via picture books – “The Joy of Sex”; but he can’t give them
anything deeper, spiritual, life-enhancing. The result is kind of like
the emotionally-barren, ideal “polis” (city-state) illustrated by the
paradox of the Philosopher-King in Plato’s “Republic.” This is what mom
said she wanted. Maybe that’s why she killed herself?
We do get a few
hints that dad’s “home-school book learning” is superior, at least in
its logical acquisition, to traditional American schools. Dad’s
8-year-old can explain what the “Bill of Rights” theoretically stand
for while his two high school age cousins have no idea. But he can’t
explain why those “rights” are quickly being threatened while the
Constitution withers away in synthetic “Wars” on Drugs and Terrorism.
He mentions “freedom” in relation to those rights, but he never
questions what freedom is, or means.
Finally, after
seeing his daughter rendered nearly paralyzed after sending her to
scale the roof of Grandpa Moneybags’ million-dollar house to “rescue”
his son (who has claimed to not want to be with him, anyway), dad
decides he’s had enough. Ok, Grandpa, you can have the kids. I give up.
And he drives away in the hippy bus; shaves off his beard; cries (over
the failed implementation of his wild dream). Then, what do you know,
the kids who have been hiding in back of the bus, run up to cheer their
broken father up. He’s learned his lesson well – no more
“back-to-nature freak stuff” – the movie ends with dad continuing his
home school lessons in a cute little house in Suburbia.
What disappoints me
is the fact that the film could have been so much more: a search for
knowledge and spiritual values from a Socratic perspective: “Unless it
comes out of a fucking book, I don’t know anything about anything”; a
return to having a respect and love for Nature; and an attempt at
building ties between each other, family and community. But all we are
left with are some “nice” Chomskyisms, a few token Marxist rah-rah’s
and a “dead end.”